Skip to Content
Organizational carbon footprint dashboard on a desk overlooking a factory

Carbon Footprint for Organization (CFO)

For people coordinating GHG inventories across manufacturing sites

Consolidate site emissions dataCheck coverage before reporting

Organize activity records and evidence by site, track missing sources and trace relevant Scope 1, 2 and 3 totals. Prepare an organizational inventory within an agreed reporting boundary.

Discuss your data requirements
Identify missing dataTrace reported figuresPrepare records for review
Click the image to open the sample system

This is a browser-based prototype with local changes, fictional data and emission factors, and simulated user roles. Reports have not been independently verified.

Sample application

Track missing data and review records before consolidation

Select a site and month in a fictional five-site packaging company. Inspect data gaps, enter and submit records for review, then open the reporting package to check boundaries and unresolved issues.

Distinguish missing data from zero
Review evidence and request corrections
Inspect issues that affect report readiness
Open the user manual ↗

Identify missing data before consolidating totals

01

Some sites have submitted data; some sources are still missing

Check expected activities by site and month, with an identified owner. Distinguish missing submissions from activities with genuine zero use.

02

Figures are available, but their sources are unclear

Keep quantities, units, document references, evidence and calculation factors with each record so reviewers can trace the inputs.

03

Submitted records are approved, but the inventory still has gaps

Review data coverage alongside internal approval status and reasons for exclusions before using the consolidated total in a report.

Organizational carbon inventory workflow

From activity data to a traceable reporting package

Define the boundary, assign data owners and review the inventory before reporting.

Start with existing records
Bills and invoicesCSV filesActivity records

ERP and IoT are optional data sources. Integration scope must be agreed separately.

  1. 01

    Set the boundary
    and reporting period

    Identify the organization, sites and emission sources included.

    Responsible role
    CFO reporting team
    Output
    Boundary and reporting period
  2. 02

    Define data needs
    and owners

    Specify the data needed and who provides it for each source.

    Responsible role
    CFO coordinator
    Output
    Data checklist with named owners
  3. 03

    Collect activity data
    and evidence

    Record quantities, units, dates and supporting documents.

    Responsible role
    Data owners
    Output
    Activity records and evidence
  4. 04

    Calculate with
    traceable factors

    Link activity data to formulas and emission factor sources.

    Responsible role
    GHG inventory preparer
    Output
    Calculations and source references
  5. 05

    Review the inventory
    internally

    Check completeness, then approve or return records for correction.

    Responsible role
    Internal reviewers
    Output
    Reviewed or returned records
  6. 06

    Assemble the
    reporting package

    Bring calculations and evidence together for external verification.

    Responsible role
    CFO coordinator
    Output
    Reports with supporting evidence

EF means emission factor per unit of activity. This diagram describes a workflow; it does not guarantee verification outcomes.

DATA TRACEABILITY

Trace a total back to its source record

One record shows why quantity, units, reporting period and the emission factor must be checked together before consolidation.

Fictional demo example, not a customer result or an official emission factor.

ACT-1-006Sample data
Site / period
Main factory · January 2026
Activity / unit
Purchased grid electricity · kWh
Document reference
DOC-1-006
Factor version
DEMO-1.0 · Fictional
100,000kWh
×
0.500kgCO₂e / kWh
=
50.000tCO₂e

The result, 50,000 kgCO₂e, converts to 50.000 tCO₂e. Approving this record does not establish that the reporting period is complete.

Start with existing data. Connect where it helps.

Traceable data matters regardless of how it reaches the system. Choose collection methods by emission source, frequency and organizational readiness.

01

Start with existing records

Use energy bills, fuel logs, waste weigh tickets and procurement records. Identify the source, unit, period and data owner. The demo supports manual entry, CSV import and evidence attachments.

Available in the demo
02

Connect business systems as volume grows

Assess data from ERP, accounting, procurement, logistics or suppliers. Agree data mapping, import frequency and duplicate checks before implementing a connection.

Assess and implement per project
03

Use IoT where frequent readings are useful

Assess electricity or fuel inputs from metering systems. Define checks for periods, coverage and duplicate counting before implementing the connection. IoT is not required to start CFO accounting.

Optional; implemented per project

Calculation boundaries must reflect actual operations

Start with organizational activities and reporting objectives, then select suitable methods and evidence. Sample data in each scope do not establish coverage of every factory emission source.

01

Scope 1: Direct emissions

Examples include fuel used by equipment or vehicles within the organizational boundary and refrigerant leakage. Identify actual sources and activity data.

02

Scope 2: Purchased energy

Examples include purchased electricity, steam, heat and cooling. The demo uses location-based reporting with fictional factors.

03

Scope 3: Other value-chain activities

Screen 15 categories for relevance, significance and reasons. The demo calculates selected sample activities, not every method in every category.

Define implementation around your data and working process

Before deployment, DigitechX will assess required data, responsibilities, review steps and reporting outputs to define a system and development scope that can be tested.

01

Review one reporting period

Use the site list, activity sources, sample files and reporting objective to identify existing data and collection gaps.

02

Specify the system and responsibilities

Agree the shared database, access permissions, evidence storage and backup, import methods and necessary integrations.

03

Test before use in actual reporting

Check calculations, applicable factors, boundaries, coverage and exports with the responsible staff. Define independent verification separately from system implementation.

ERP/IoT connections, a shared database and real user authentication are not part of the current demo. They require assessment and implementation within the project scope.

Questions before starting a project

Do we need IoT or a new ERP system first?

No. Start with activity records and evidence such as bills, documents and CSV files. If particular sources need frequent collection or substantial repeated work, assess existing-system or device integration against its value and cost.

What should each site submit, and who owns the data?

Identify sources within the boundary, such as energy, fuel, refrigerants, transport or waste, then assign the actual owner of each source. Inventory coordination and review may be separate responsibilities; department names need not be the same across factories.

If all submitted records are approved, is the inventory complete?

Not necessarily. Check the expected sources, sites and reporting periods as well. A source with no submission must remain visible as outstanding or have an appropriate documented exclusion reason.

Does the software replace consulting or TGO-related verification?

No. It supports data preparation and internal review. Inventory methods, consulting and independent verification must be defined for the intended purpose and applicable criteria. Approving records or exporting a report is not TGO certification.

Can output intensity be used directly for CFP, CBAM or carbon credits?

Not automatically. An internal organizational indicator does not replace a product-level study, reporting for goods covered by CBAM or a carbon-credit process. These have distinct boundaries, methods and requirements.

What is needed to estimate price and implementation time?

Prepare the number of sites, reporting periods, data-source list, sample files, involved roles and required outputs. Data preparation, configuration, integrations and any additional services can then be assessed as separate items.

Assess the system using your factory's existing records

Bring your site list, sample files and reporting objective to DigitechX to define data collection, review steps and an implementation scope appropriate to your organization.

Contact options Hide contact options